Key result
Telemedicine use reaches ~58% among German outpatient physicians, linked to structural factors and perceived benefits.
Why the study?
Telemedicine offers promising solutions for outpatient cardiovascular care, but barriers limit uptake, and prior studies struggled with model uncertainty and complex relationships.
Cross-Sectional (n=165)
Telemedicine adoption among German outpatient physicians is associated with structural factors and perceived patient benefits, though predictive modeling was limited by small sample size and high uncertainty.
May inform targeted training and infrastructure efforts in German outpatient care; leaves open causal mechanisms and generalizability.
Background Cardiovascular diseases remain a major health burden in Germany, and telemedicine (TM) offers promising solutions for outpatient care, yet barriers limit uptake. While prior studies relied on qualitative or conventional statistical methods, they often struggled with model uncertainty and complex relationships. Building on a national survey, this study applies Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Objectives This study aimed to explore candidate associations and patterns related to TM use among physicians in the German outpatient sector. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of a web-based survey carried out between 2023 and 2024. BMA was applied to identify explanatory associations with TM use, explicitly accounting for model uncertainty. XGBoost with SHAP values was used to explore classification patterns in a hypothesis-generating framework using repeated nested cross-validation. Results Of the 165 respondents, 95 (58%) reported using TM. BMA revealed a limited number of variables with moderate to high posterior inclusion probabilities (PIP), alongside substantial overall model uncertainty, with TM use associated with receiving information from professional associations or insurers and perceived TM benefits (e.g., improving patients’ everyday quality of life, improving doctor-patient relationship). Practicing in Lower Saxony was associated with lower TM use. XGBoost demonstrated limited discriminative ability, with performance statistically indistinguishable from chance. SHAP-based analyses therefore identified exploratory patterns, including features such as information status, workplace, perceptions of TM’s benefits for patients (e.g., health literacy, compliance and adherence) and TM’s barriers (e.g., data protection, implementation incompatibility), as well as employment status. Conclusion TM adoption in Germany’s outpatient sector appears associated with structural–economic factors and physicians’ perceptions of patient-related benefits. However, given the substantial model uncertainty in BMA and the limited predictive performance of the machine learning model, all findings should be interpreted cautiously. The machine learning component should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petit et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Physicians in the German outpatient sector (n=165). Factors associated with telemedicine use was evaluated on Telemedicine use. Telemedicine adoption among German outpatient physicians was 58% and associated with structural-economic factors and perceptions of patient-related benefits.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: