Key result
Apixaban patients show only 24% adherence to the recommended dosing interval, regardless of age.
Why the study?
Many patients interpret twice daily as taking 2 tablets per day rather than at 12-hour intervals, which may lead to incorrect dosing intervals and loss of anticoagulation protection.
Do patients prescribed twice-daily apixaban adhere to the recommended 12-hour dosing interval, and does age influence this adherence?
Cross-Sectional (n=95)
Do patients prescribed twice-daily apixaban adhere to the recommended 12-hour dosing interval, and does age influence this adherence?
Only one-quarter of patients prescribed twice-daily apixaban adhere to the recommended 12-hour dosing interval, highlighting a critical need for clearer patient education to ensure safe and effective anticoagulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dosing interval adherence to apixaban appears low across settings; leaves open whether education interventions improve outcomes in prospective studies.
Background Apixaban should be taken at 12-hour intervals to ensure stable anticoagulation1. Many patients interpret "twice daily" as taking 2 tablets per day, leading to incorrect dosing intervals and potential loss of protection. This audit assessed adherence across inpatient, community, and integrated cardiovascular care settings. Aim To determine whether patients took apixaban at 12-hour intervals, identify patterns of incorrect dosing, and assess whether age influenced correct dosing. Methods A cross-sectional audit was conducted among adults prescribed apixaban across inpatient services, community pharmacy, and integrated cardiovascular care settings within a regional health service. Patients self-reported usual dosing times, which were compared with the recommended 12-hour dosing interval. Correct dosing was defined as administration within ±1 hour of a 12-hour interval. Demographic data were collected, and logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between age and correct dosing behaviour. Results • Total sample: 95 patients (55 males, 58%), aged 42–98 years • Correct 12-hour dosing: 23 patients (24%) • Incorrect interval: 72 patients (76%) • Once-daily dosing: 1 patient (1%) (only taking one tablet a day) • Both tablets taken together in the morning: 5 patients (5.3%) • Second tablet taken too early: 42 patients (44%): Intervals ranged 1–11 hours (average 3 hours early) • Second tablet taken late: 24 patients (25%) Intervals ranged 13–16 hours (average 2 hours late) • Participants aged ≤ 65 years had 28 % lower odds of adhering to 12-hourly dosing than those aged > 65 years (OR = 0.72). However, the difference was not statistically significant (p ≈ 0.98) Among participants aged ≤ 65 years (n = 12), 25 % adhered to 12-hourly dosing compared with 31 % of those aged > 65 years (n = 83). Although younger adults had lower odds of adherence (OR = 0.72, p = 0.98), this difference was not significant, suggesting that age was not a major determinant of correct dosing interval. Conclusion Only one-quarter of patients were administered apixaban at the recommended 12-hour interval. Misinterpretation of "twice daily" dosing was common, while age was not associated with correct dosing. Clearer patient education is needed to support safe and effective anticoagulation. 1 in 4 follow Recommended Dosing
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caples et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Patients prescribed apixaban (n=95). Age ≤ 65 years vs. Age > 65 years was evaluated on Adherence to 12-hourly dosing (administration within ±1 hour of a 12-hour interval) (OR 0.72, p=0.98). Only 24% of patients took apixaban at the recommended 12-hour interval, and age ≤65 years was not significantly associated with adherence compared to age >65 years (OR 0.72, p=0.98).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: