Key result
Preoperative echocardiographic markers fail to consistently predict POAF after CABG.
Why the study?
Postoperative atrial fibrillation is a common, costly complication after CABG, and preoperative echocardiographic parameters may predict its development.
Do preoperative echocardiographic parameters predict early postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing CABG?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,983)
Do preoperative echocardiographic parameters predict early postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing CABG?
Odds Ratio: 1.31 (95% CI 0.92–1.87)
p-value: p=0.13
Current preoperative echocardiographic markers, including LAVI, PALS, and LASRa, do not demonstrate consistent or robust predictive value for postoperative atrial fibrillation after CABG when pooled across heterogeneous studies.
Preoperative echo parameters stratify POAF risk after CABG; extends prior data and supports targeted prophylaxis trials.
Background Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), which is associated with increased morbidity, longer hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Preoperative echocardiographic parameters may play an important role in predicting the risk of POAF. Objective To identify and evaluate preoperative echocardiographic parameters that can predict the development of POAF in patients undergoing CABG. Methods A systematic search was performed from January 2010 to October 2025 in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. Results Twenty-three studies (n = 2,983 patients) were included. POAF incidence ranged from 22% to 40%, with a pooled rate of 28.8% (95% CI: 21%–34%). Meta-analyses showed no significant pooled associations for left atrial volume index (LAVI) (OR 1.31; 95% CI: 0.92–1.87; I² = 99.9%), peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) 0.65 (95% CI: 0.38–1.11); I² = 99.9%), or LA contraction strain (LASRa) (OR 1.91; 95% CI: 0.83–4.41; I² = 98.1%). Heterogeneity was substantial across all outcomes. Limited data suggested potential predictive value for right atrial indices and single-study parameters such as LA kinetic energy. Conclusion Current echocardiographic markers including LAVI, PALS, and LASRa, do not demonstrate consistent or robust predictive value for POAF when pooled across heterogeneous studies. Standardized measurement protocols and larger prospective cohorts are needed to clarify the role of atrial structural and functional indices in POAF risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teimouri-Jervekani et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=2,983). Preoperative echocardiographic parameters (Left atrial volume index) vs. Lower/normal echocardiographic parameter values was evaluated on Early postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.87, p=0.13). Preoperative echocardiographic markers including left atrial volume index (OR 1.31) did not demonstrate consistent or robust predictive value for postoperative atrial fibrillation after CABG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: