Key result
Virtual double stent-grafting for aortic dissection reduced energy loss by 40% and improved wall shear stress distribution compared to single stent-graft and pre-stenting simulations.
Why the study?
Does virtual stenting (single vs double stent-graft) improve hemodynamic parameters such as pressure and energy loss in a computational model of aortic dissection?
Does virtual stenting (single vs double stent-graft) improve hemodynamic parameters such as pressure and energy loss in a computational model of aortic dissection?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics modeling of virtual stenting in aortic dissection suggests that a double stent-graft configuration may provide superior hemodynamic improvements compared to a single stent-graft.
Aortic dissection treatment varies for each patient and stenting is one of a number of approaches that are utilized to Stabilize the condition. Information regarding the hemodynamic forces in the aorta in dissected and virtually stented cases could support clinicians in their choices of treatment prior to medical intervention. Computational fluid dynamics coupled with lumped parameter models have shown promise in providing detailed information that could be used in the clinic; for this, it is necessary to develop personalized workflows in order to produce patient-specific simulations. In the present study, a case of pre- and post-stenting (virtual stent-graft) of an aortic dissection is investigated with a particular focus on the role of personalized boundary conditions. For each virtual case, velocity, pressure, energy loss, and wall shear stress values are evaluated and compared. The simulated single stent-graft only marginally reduced the pulse pressure and systemic energy loss. The double stent-graft results showed a larger reduction in pulse pressure and a 40% reduction in energy loss as well as a more physiological wall shear stress distribution.Regions of potential risk were highlighted. The methodology applied in the present study revealed detailed information about two possible surgical outcome cases and shows promise as both a diagnostic and an interventional tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alimohammadi et al. (2014) studied Aortic dissection (n=1). Virtual stenting (single and double stent-graft) vs. Pre-stenting was evaluated on Hemodynamic forces including velocity, pressure, energy loss, and wall shear stress. Virtual double stent-grafting for aortic dissection reduced energy loss by 40% and improved wall shear stress distribution compared to single stent-graft and pre-stenting simulations.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: