Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In traditional bootstrap applications the size of a bootstrap sample equals the parent sample size, n say. Recent studies have shown that using a bootstrap sample size different from n may sometimes provide a more satisfactory solution. In this paper we apply the latter approach to correct for coverage error in construction of bootstrap confidence bounds. We show that the coverage error of a bootstrap percentile method confidence bound, which is of order O ( n −2/2 ) typically, can be reduced to O ( n −1 ) by use of an optimal bootstrap sample size. A simulation study is conducted to illustrate our findings, which also suggest that the new method yields intervals of shorter length and greater stability compared to competitors of similar coverage accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: