Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants demonstrated favorable benefit-risk profiles compared with conventional standard therapy for venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
What is the rationale and clinical evidence for selected dosing regimens of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
What is the rationale and clinical evidence for selected dosing regimens of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
This review highlights the favorable benefit-risk profile of DOACs over standard therapy and emphasizes the importance of considering dosing regimens and patient characteristics to optimize adherence and clinical outcomes.
Anticoagulation therapy is central to the management of thromboembolic disorders, and the use of direct oral anticoagulants offers several advantages over standard therapy with parenteral heparins and vitamin K antagonists. In phase III clinical trials, the direct oral anticoagulants (given once or twice daily) all demonstrated favorable benefit-risk profiles compared with conventional standard therapy for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism and for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In clinical practice, many factors may influence overall clinical outcomes in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy, including adherence and persistence to the prescribed therapy, which becomes particularly important during long-term therapy. When choosing an anticoagulant for an individual patient, the pharmacological and clinical profile of the anticoagulant, its dosing regimen, and the patient's clinical characteristics (eg, renal function and comorbidities) and preferences should be considered. This review examines the rationale for and clinical evidence of the selected dosing regimens of the direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The potential influence of dosing strategies (eg, once- or twice-daily dosing) and other factors on patient adherence and therapy persistence are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amin et al. (2015) conducted a review in Thromboembolic disorders. Direct oral anticoagulants vs. Standard therapy with parenteral heparins and vitamin K antagonists was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants demonstrated favorable benefit-risk profiles compared with conventional standard therapy for venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: