Key result
A blood pressure prediction model using pulse wave velocity, BMI, and age, stratified by age 60, predicted blood pressure with errors within 9 to 12 mmHg, satisfying AAMI criteria.
Why the study?
Previous studies predicting blood pressure using pulse transit time and pulse wave velocity were small and could not confirm the relative importance of variables.
Does a prediction model based on pulse wave velocity, BMI, and age accurately predict blood pressure in healthy men?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,362)
No
Does a prediction model based on pulse wave velocity, BMI, and age accurately predict blood pressure in healthy men?
A simple algorithm using pulse wave velocity, BMI, and age can accurately predict blood pressure in healthy men, facilitating continuous BP monitoring.
May support cuffless BP monitoring development; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Pulse transit time and pulse wave velocity (PWV) are related to blood pressure (BP), and there were continuous attempts to use these to predict BP through wearable devices. However, previous studies were conducted on a small scale and could not confirm the relative importance of each variable in predicting BP. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to predict systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure based on PWV and to evaluate the relative importance of each clinical variable used in BP prediction models. METHODS: This study was conducted on 1362 healthy men older than 18 years who visited the Samsung Medical Center. The systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were estimated using the multiple linear regression method. Models were divided into two groups based on age: younger than 60 years and 60 years or older; 200 seeds were repeated in consideration of partition bias. Mean of error, absolute error, and root mean square error were used as performance metrics. RESULTS: The model divided into two age groups (younger than 60 years and 60 years and older) performed better than the model without division. The performance difference between the model using only three variables (PWV, BMI, age) and the model using 17 variables was not significant. Our final model using PWV, BMI, and age met the criteria presented by the American Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. The prediction errors were within the range of about 9 to 12 mmHg that can occur with a gold standard mercury sphygmomanometer. CONCLUSIONS: Dividing age based on the age of 60 years showed better BP prediction performance, and it could show good performance even if only PWV, BMI, and age variables were included. Our final model with the minimal number of variables (PWB, BMI, age) would be efficient and feasible for predicting BP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (Blood pressure prediction) (n=1,362). Blood pressure prediction algorithm using PWV, BMI, and age vs. Actual blood pressure measurements was evaluated on Prediction error of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (RMSE and mean difference). A blood pressure prediction model using pulse wave velocity, BMI, and age, stratified by age 60, predicted blood pressure with errors within 9 to 12 mmHg, satisfying AAMI criteria.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: