Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this major work, Blumenberg takes issue with Karl Lowith's well-known thesis that the idea of progress is a secularized version of Christian eschatology, which promises a dramatic intervention that will consummate the history of the world from outside. Instead, Blumenberg argues, the idea of progress always implies a process at work within history, operating through an internal logic that ultimately expresses human choices and is legitimized by human self-assertion, by man's responsibility for his own fate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jay et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: