Key result
Liraglutide did not significantly change circumferential peak early diastolic strain rate compared to sitagliptin after 26 weeks (mean difference -0.01 s-1; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.06).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the effects of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor on magnetic resonance imaging-derived measures of cardiovascular function.
Does liraglutide improve circumferential peak early diastolic strain rate compared to sitagliptin in young obese adults with type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=76)
Open-label
randomized
Does liraglutide improve circumferential peak early diastolic strain rate compared to sitagliptin in young obese adults with type 2 diabetes?
Mean Difference: -0.01 (95% CI -0.07–0.06)
Short-term treatment with liraglutide compared to sitagliptin did not significantly alter MRI-derived measures of diastolic function in young, obese adults with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes.
Liraglutide does not improve diastolic strain rate over sitagliptin in young obese T2D; challenges short-term GLP-1RA benefits on MRI diastolic measures.
Aim To compare the effects of a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist and a dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor on magnetic resonance imaging‐derived measures of cardiovascular function. Materials and methods In a prospective, randomized, open‐label, blinded endpoint trial liraglutide (1.8 mg) and sitagliptin (100 mg) were compared in asymptomatic, non‐insulin treated young (aged 18‐50 years) adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes. The primary outcome was difference in circumferential peak early diastolic strain rate change (PEDSR), a biomarker of cardiac diastolic dysfunction 26 weeks after randomization. Secondary outcomes included other indices of cardiac structure and function, HbA1c and body weight. Results Seventy‐six participants were randomized (54% female, mean ± SD age 44 ± 6 years, diabetes duration 4.4 years, body mass index 35.3 ± 6.1 kg m −2 ), of whom 65% had ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor. Sixty‐one participants had primary outcome data available. There were no statistically significant between‐group differences (intention‐to‐treat; mean [95% confidence interval]) in PEDSR change (−0.01 [−0.07, +0.06] s −1 ), left ventricular ejection fraction (−1.98 [−4.90, +0.94]%), left ventricular mass (+1.14 [−5.23, +7.50] g) or aortic distensibility (−0.35 [−0.98, +0.28] mmHg −1 × 10 −3 ) after 26 weeks. Reductions in HbA1c (−4.57 [−9.10, −0.37] mmol mol −1 ) and body weight (−3.88 [−5.74, −2.01] kg) were greater with liraglutide. Conclusion There were no differences in cardiovascular structure or function after short‐term use of liraglutide and sitagliptin in younger adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Longer studies in patients with more severe cardiac dysfunction may be necessary before definitive conclusions can be made about putative pleiotropic properties of incretin‐based therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Webb et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in obesity and type 2 diabetes (n=76). liraglutide vs. sitagliptin (100 mg) was evaluated on difference in circumferential peak early diastolic strain rate change (PEDSR) (MD -0.01, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.06). Liraglutide did not significantly change circumferential peak early diastolic strain rate compared to sitagliptin after 26 weeks (mean difference -0.01 s-1; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.06).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: