Key result
Persistent in-stent restenosis highlights the need for genetically tailored therapeutic strategies after PCI.
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was introduced as an alternative means of coronary revascularization in 1979. Since then it has become widely accepted as an effective and safe treatment modality for single and multivessel coronary atherosclerotic disease. However, a major drawback to PTCA has been restenosis of the treated vessel, resulting in renewed symptoms and the need for repeat intervention. Various (pharmacological) strategies have proven to be disappointing in preventing this phenomenon. Other percutaneous coronary intervention techniques have been developed with varying efficacy. Only the introduction of the intracoronary stent has reduced the incidence of restenosis considerably. On average stenting is associated with improved outcomes, although restenosis still occurs. Furthermore, the new phenomenon of in-stent restenosis appears to be therapy resistant. In the light of the increasing number of patients being treated with multiple percutaneous coronary interventions, the increasing cost of interventional cardiology due to adjuvant medication and devices, and the
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Willem R.P. Agema (2001) conducted a review in Coronary atherosclerotic disease and restenosis. Genetically tailored therapy was evaluated. Restenosis and in-stent restenosis remain major clinical challenges after percutaneous coronary interventions, emphasizing the potential need for genetically-guided, tailored therapeutic strategies.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: