Key result
Repeated bone marrow cell infusions boost LVEF ~5 percentage points over a single dose.
RCT (n=39)
Absolute Event Rate: 11.7% vs 7.2%
p-value: p=< 0.001
AIMS: We sought to determine whether repeat administration of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMC) can improve left ventricular function compared with a single infusion in patients with large acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with a ST-elevation AMI of the anterior wall and a significantly decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF 20-39%) were randomly assigned to three groups following primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Group A (n = 12) received a single intracoronary infusion of BMC (1.9 +/- 1.2 x 10(8)) at 3-7 days after AMI; Group B (n = 15) received BMC administration both at 3-7 days (2.0 +/- 1.4 x 10(8)) and at 3 months (2.1 +/- 1.7 x 10(8)); and the control group (CON, n = 12) received one placebo injection at 3-7 days. We noted no severe complications associated with the BMC transfer. The increase in LVEF evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after 12 months in Group B (11.7 +/- 2.6%) was significantly greater than that in Group A (7.2 +/- 1.6%, P < 0.001) or in CON (2.9 +/- 2.0%, P < 0.001). Magnetic resonance imaging-derived myocardial infarct size decreased significantly in Group B compared with Group A (11.3 +/- 2.7% vs. 6.3 +/- 1.6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Data from this preliminary study suggest that repeated BMC administration might be a safe and feasible therapeutic strategy for patients with large AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Acute myocardial infarction (n=39). Repeated autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMC) therapy vs. Single infusion of BMC or placebo injection was evaluated on Increase in left ventricular ejection fraction evaluated by MRI after 12 months (p=< 0.001). Repeated administration of bone marrow mononuclear cells significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction at 12 months compared to a single infusion (11.7% vs 7.2%; P<0.001) or placebo (2.9%).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: