Key result
Patients recovering from COVID-19 hospitalization without myocarditis had significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction at peak exercise stress compared to healthy subjects (66.7% vs 73%).
Why the study?
Usual clinical testing rarely reveals persistent cardiac abnormalities after COVID hospitalization, potentially overlooking residual changes that cause increased adverse cardiac events post-discharge.
Does prior severe COVID-19 infection without overt myocarditis impair left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during exercise stress echocardiography?
Observational (n=46)
No
Does prior severe COVID-19 infection without overt myocarditis impair left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during exercise stress echocardiography?
Exercise stress echocardiography reveals subtle impairment in left ventricular contractile and diastolic reserve in patients recovering from COVID-19 without prior clinical evidence of myocarditis.
Suggests subclinical exercise-induced LV impairment post-COVID without myocarditis; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Usual clinical testing rarely reveals cardiac abnormalities persisting after hospitalization for COVID. Such testing may overlook residual changes causing increased adverse cardiac events post-discharge. To clarify status post-hospitalization, we related exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in 15 recovering patients (RP) age 30-63 without myocarditis to matching published data from healthy subjects (HS). RP exercise, average duration 8.2 ± 2.2 SD, was halted by dyspnea or fatigue. RP baselines matched HS except for higher heart rate. At peak stress, RP had significantly lower mean left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (67% ± 7 vs. 73% ± 5, p < 0.0017) and higher peak early mitral inflow velocity/early mitral annular velocity (E/e', 9.1 ± 2.5 vs. 6.6 ± 2.5, p < 0.006) compared with HS performing equal exercise (8.5 ± 2.6 min). Thus, when stressed, patients without known cardiac impairment showed diminished systolic contractile function and diastolic LV compliance vs. HS. RP peak heart rate was significantly higher (172 ± 18 vs. 153 ± 20); peak systolic blood pressure trended higher (192 ± 31 vs. 178 ± 19). Pulmonary artery systolic pressures among RP remained normal. ESE uniquely identified residual abnormality in cardiac contractile function not evident unstressed, exposing previously unrecognized residual influence of COVID-19. This may reflect autonomic dysfunction, microvascular disease, or diffuse interstitial changes; these results may have implications for clinical management and later prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldstein et al. (2024) conducted an observational in COVID-19 recovery (n=46). COVID-19 hospitalization vs. Healthy subjects was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at peak stress (p=0.0014). Patients recovering from COVID-19 hospitalization without myocarditis had significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction at peak exercise stress compared to healthy subjects (66.7% vs 73%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: