Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this work, the statistical asperity microcontact models in combination with the acoustic spring model and the load sharing concept are utilized to study the interfacial normal contact stiffness for a rough surface in line contact elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL). Two different statistical microcontact models of Greenwood and Williamson (GW) and Kogut and Etsion (KE) are employed to derive the normal contact stiffness expressions for a dry rough line contact considering the purely elastic contact and the multiple regimes elastic–elastoplastic–fully plastic contact, respectively. The liquid film stiffness is calculated based on the relationship between film thickness and bulk modulus of the lubricant. The lubricant film thickness equations are employed in conjunction with the load sharing concept and the empirical formulas for the maximum contact pressure in a dry rough contact are fitted for the GW model and the KE model, to evaluate the relationship between film thickness and motion velocity for the purely elastic GW microcontact model and the multiregime KE microcontact model, respectively. The comparison with experimental results shows that the KE model predicts closer total contact stiffness results than the GW model. The stiffness contributions from the solid asperity contact and lubricant film are obtained and effects of surface roughness, applied load, motion velocity, and type of lubricant on the normal contact stiffness are analyzed.
Xiao et al. (Mon,) studied this question.