Key result
Coronary function test-guided management evaluated for 12-month angina symptoms in ANOCA.
Why the study?
Angina and no obstructive coronary arteries is common following coronary angiography, prompting evaluation of causes of angina and the effects of coronary function test-guided management on clinical outcomes.
Does coronary function test-guided management improve angina symptoms in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA)?
RCT (n=1,483)
Triple-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does coronary function test-guided management improve angina symptoms in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA)?
The iCorMicA trial will evaluate whether disclosing coronary function test results to guide management improves symptoms and outcomes in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries.
BACKGROUND: Angina is a debilitating condition caused by coronary artery disease and microvascular dysfunction. Following coronary angiography angina and no obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) is a common outcome, and women are disproportionately affected. The objectives are first, to assess causes of angina in patients undergoing invasive management; and second, to assess effects of coronary function test-guided management on clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is an international, multicenter, prospective, registry-based study and nested, randomized, controlled, triple-blind, endpoint trial. Participants, community care providers, and outcomes assessors are masked. Consented participants enter the registry. Participants without obstructive coronary artery disease (luminal stenosis <50%, or fractional flow reserve >0.80) are eligible for randomization. Index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR; abnormal ≥25) and coronary flow reserve (CFR; abnormal <2.0; grey zone 2.0-2.5) are measured by bolus thermodilution, and results are disclosed (intervention) or not (control group) to the attending cardiologist. The primary outcome of the registry is the Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score at baseline described by coronary artery disease status. Secondary outcomes include the prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease, patient reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome of the randomized trial is the within-individual change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score at 12-months from baseline. Secondary outcomes include safety, diagnostic accuracy, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for quality of life, physical and psychological function, cardiovascular risk, clinical outcomes, health economics and mechanistic biomarkers. The first patient was screened on 18 December 2020 and the last patient was enrolled on 30 June 2026. Forty sites were included in the United Kingdom (n=35), Republic of Ireland (n=2), Holland (n=2) and Poland (n=1). In total, 1483 participants were enrolled into the registry of whom 1047 were randomized and 386 were not randomized (registry-only). VALUE: This international, registry-based clinical trial will provide novel evidence on the natural history of angina and stratified therapy for ANOCA. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT04674449.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Angina and no obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) (n=1,483). Coronary function test-guided management vs. Control (test results not disclosed) was evaluated on Within-individual change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score at 12-months from baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: