This study examined middle school students’ perspectives on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools during a week-long civic engagement camp in which students enhanced their digital media literacy and GenAI knowledge while using an action civics cycle of inquiry to investigate and propose solutions to community issues. Following a lesson that included information on using GenAI for research, students worked collaboratively on inquiry projects addressing issues such as homelessness and animal welfare. The researchers explored students’ perceptions of GenAI’s benefits and challenges using surveys, focus groups, and written responses. Findings indicated that while students appreciated GenAI’s ability to compile and provide detailed information, they expressed skepticism regarding its accuracy and trustworthiness, as well as concerns related to dependence on the technology and ethical issues. This study offers insights for educators seeking to integrate GenAI in middle school education, emphasizing the need for instructional support that addresses both the technological affordances and limitations of GenAI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: