Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Cavitation erosion of AISI 420 grade stainless steels was investigated after different heat treatments. The steels were subjected to 20 hours of cavitation erosion using an ultrasonic vibratory apparatus. The mass losses were measured, and the results were compared with material properties. The eroded surfaces were examined with X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and optical profilometry. The results suggest that the cavitation erosion resistance is heavily dependent on the carbon content and the performed heat treatment. While for 0.2 C grade the best results were achieved in as-quenched condition, quenching and partitioning should be used when the carbon content is higher. During cavitation present retained austenite transforms into martensite, which hardens the surface and reduces the cavitation erosion rate. Thus, elimination of retained austenite with cryogenic treatment is not beneficial. If the steel is quenched without partitioning or tempering, the resulting microstructure may become brittle, eventually leading to high erosion rate. The results indicate that even short partitioning heat treatment can effectively reduce the martensite brittleness without sacrificing hardness or cavitation erosion resistance. • Heat treated stainless steels were eroded with cavitation. • High hardness improves cavitation erosion resistance. • The cavitation erosion rate stabilises after 14 hours of cavitation. • Quenching and partitioning reduces martensite brittleness and enhances performance. • Cryogenic treatments resulted in poor performance due to missing TRIP-effect.
Raami et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: