Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validates a specific MRI cut-off for classifying axial spondyloarthritis, suggesting a new evaluation approach.
BACKGROUND: According to the modified New York criteria (mNYc), moderate-severe sacroiliac joint (SIJ) structural damage on radiography is necessary for classifying radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA). In contrast to radiography, MRI provides no ionizing radiation, higher sensitivity for structural damage, better inter-reader reliability, and is gradually replacing radiography. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate a high specificity MRI cut-off to the radiographic component of the mNYc (rad-mNYc), defined as MRI findings that correspond to an mNY-positive radiograph. METHODS: based on erosion, backfill and ankylosis in 5/all slices) and ROC curves were calculated. Internal validation by bootstrapping was performed. RESULTS: predicting rad-mNYc (specificity 0.95, sensitivity 0.39, area-under-curve 0.83, accuracy with mNYc 69.2%. Internal validation showed moderate accuracy and high positive predictive value. Cut-offs for sclerosis, erosion, backfill and ankylosis were ≥ 9, ≥12, ≥ 5, and ≥ 1, respectively, with sensitivities all ≤ 0.21 except ankylosis 0.34 and accuracy ~ 60%, except ankylosis 67%. Cut-offs using all MRI-slices performed slightly worse or similarly. CONCLUSIONS: ) was the optimal high specificity MRI cut-off to rad-mNYc positivity, being potentially usable in both research and clinical settings, with different thresholds depending on whether sensitivity or specificity is prioritized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hadsbjerg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: