Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review investigates survival outcomes in head and neck neuroendocrine carcinoma, indicating treatment variability and outcomes.
Background This systematic review investigated pathological, oncological, and survival outcomes of Head and neck neuroendocrine carcinoma (HNNEC). Methods Three independent investigators conducted a PRISMA‐compliant literature search. Primary outcomes included tumor stage, overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival, recurrence, metastasis, and therapeutic strategies. Results The most common locations were the larynx ( n = 1041), sinonasal tract ( n = 917), and oropharynx ( n = 366), mostly cT2/cT4 and cN0/cN2. Small‐cell carcinoma predominated ( n = 2334). Laryngeal tumors were preferentially treated by surgery plus radiotherapy, sinonasal/nasopharyngeal tumors by chemoradiotherapy, and salivary tumors by surgery with adjuvant therapy. Surgical cohorts achieved 5‐year OS of 33.0%–73.9%, and multimodal CRT‐plus‐surgery 57.2%–61.0%. Laryngeal and mucosal tumors had more favorable outcomes than sinonasal/salivary localizations; well/moderately‐differentiated carcinoids outperformed poorly‐differentiated and small‐cell variants (median OS < 24 months). Conclusion HNNEC survival strongly depends on histology, site, and treatment modality. Substantial therapeutic heterogeneity reflects the lack of guidelines, highlighting the need for standardized, histology‐ and site‐specific management recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aïta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: