Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines building damage associated with ground motion parameters during the 2016 earthquake, suggesting implications for seismic risk assessment.
This study examines the relationship between operational ground-motion parameters and building damage during the 2016 M w 6.4 Meinong earthquake in southern Taiwan. We integrate strong-motion recordings from 599 Taiwan Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (TSMIP) stations with a manually verified, georeferenced dataset of 626 damaged buildings, including 271 red-tagged and 355 yellow-tagged buildings in Tainan City. The analysis was conducted at the administrative-district level by comparing district-level damage rates with interval-based peak ground acceleration (PGA) and peak ground velocity (PGV) estimates. Non-zero district-level damage rates first appeared in the PGA interval of approximately 150–175 gal and the PGV interval of approximately 10–20 cm/s, corresponding to approximately MMI VI–VII. In this interval-averaged district-level analysis, PGA showed a clearer descriptive correspondence with red- and yellow-tagged building damage rates than PGV. Building-story information indicates that approximately 70% of the damaged buildings were low-rise structures, suggesting that the observed PGA correspondence may be related to the predominance of low-rise buildings and short-period shaking in the most heavily damaged areas. The results do not imply that PGA is universally superior to PGV; rather, PGA and PGV should be interpreted as complementary parameters whose relative usefulness depends on building inventory, site conditions, and analytical scale. This work provides a manually verified building damage dataset and an event-specific reference for interpreting rapid shaking maps and seismic impact information under Taiwan’s updated red- and yellow-tagged building classification system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan-yi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: