PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 19, 2026Forests0 citationsOpen Access

Economic Risk Modeling in Forestry Projects Using Harvesting and Transportation Cost Variables

View Full Paper
LFLuís Carlos de FreitasMSMárcio Lopes da SilvaFFFrancisco de Assis Costa Ferreira

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the economic viability and risk factors of a eucalyptus forestry project.
  • Estimated operational costs using standard cost models and operational records.
  • Evaluated economic viability with NPV, IRR, EAV, and APC.
  • Conducted Monte Carlo simulation with ±10% cost variations over 10,000 iterations.
  • NPV of USD 110.11 ha−1, IRR of 8.0%, EAV of USD 20.43 ha−1 year−1, and APC of USD 29.11 m−3.
  • An 11.5% probability of economic infeasibility was found.
  • Interest rate, transportation distance, and manual loading cost significantly affected NPV.

Abstract

This study evaluated the economic viability and risk of a eucalyptus forestry project by integrating deterministic and probabilistic economic analyses. Operational costs for motor–manual harvesting, manual extraction and loading, and forest transportation were estimated using standard cost models, while silvicultural, road maintenance, and transportation costs were obtained from operational records. Economic viability was assessed using Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Equivalent Annual Value (EAV), and Average Production Cost (APC). Economic risk was evaluated through Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations), considering ±10% variation in interest rate, transportation distance, harvesting productivity, labor, fuel, lubricant, and road maintenance costs, followed by sensitivity and correlation analyses. The project was economically viable, presenting an NPV of USD 110.11 ha−1, an IRR of 8.0%, an EAV of USD 20.43 ha−1 year−1, and an APC of USD 29.11 m−3. Transportation distance showed a limited operational slack of only 10 km when land cost was considered, indicating that the project operates close to its economic limit. Monte Carlo simulation indicated an 11.5% probability of economic infeasibility, while interest rate, transportation distance, and manual loading cost exerted the greatest negative influence on NPV. The integrated deterministic and probabilistic approach enabled the identification of critical operational thresholds for transportation distance, timber price, wood productivity, and land cost under the evaluated conditions, providing practical decision-support parameters for transportation planning, cost management, and economic risk assessment in similar forestry projects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Freitas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5c6939118b92953e3eda12https://doi.org/10.3390/f17070846
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Timber Harvesting Economics in Early Commercial Thinning and Group Selection Prescriptions2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Economic analysis of Eucalyptus biomass cultivation for energy in Argentina2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Association of Methodologies for Assessing Environmental Damage and Impacts Applied to Mechanized Forest Harvesting2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Economic risk modeling in charcoal road transportation: a case study from Brazil2026
  5. 5Environmental Impacts of Mechanized Timber Harvesting in Eucalyptus Plantations in Brazil2024 · 2 citations