Key result
Higher CTI is linked to ~26% greater all-cause mortality per unit increment.
Why the study?
Does a higher C-reactive protein–triglyceride–glucose index (CTI) increase the risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in US adults?
Cohort (n=9,264)
Yes
Does a higher C-reactive protein–triglyceride–glucose index (CTI) increase the risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in US adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The C-reactive protein–triglyceride–glucose index (CTI), integrating insulin resistance and systemic inflammation, independently predicts long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in US adults.
INTRODUCTION: The C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI) is an emerging composite biomarker reflecting insulin resistanceand systemic inflammation. Research regarding the relationship between CTI and risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality remainslimited and inconsistent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 9,264 USA adults aged ≥ 20 years were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2010). Mortality status was determined through linkage to the National Death Index through 31 December 2019. Hazardratios (HRs) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were estimated using weighted Kaplan-Meier methods, restricted cubic spline(RCS) models, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Prespecified subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyseswere conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 12.8 years, 2,644 deaths occurred, including 2,009 attributable to all causes and 635 to cardiovascular causes. After adjustment for potential confounders, each one-unit increment in CTI was associated with a 26% higher risk of all-causemortality [HR, 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-1.38; p < 0.001) and a 25% higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.25; 95% CI,1.03-1.51; p = 0.021). Participants in the highest CTI quartile demonstrated a 33% higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with thosein the lowest quartile (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.07-1.64; p = 0.010). RCS analyses indicated a nonlinear association between CTI and all-causemortality (p for nonlinearity = 0.018), with an inflection point at a CTI value of 9.25, whereas a linear association was observed for cardiovascular mortality (p for nonlinearity = 0.072). No statistically significant interactions were identified across prespecified subgroups. The results remained consistent after exclusion of early deaths (≤ 2 years) and after exclusion of participants with neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: Higher CTI levels were independently associated with increased risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among USA adults. These findings suggest that CTI may serve as a clinically relevant biomarker for early identification of individuals at elevated mortality risk, with potential implications for risk stratification, targeted prevention strategies, and healthcare resource allocation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in General adult population (insulin resistance and systemic inflammation) (n=9,264). C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI, per 1-unit increment and across quartiles) vs. Lower CTI levels / lowest CTI quartile (Q1 ≤ 8.37) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (per 1-unit increment in CTI) (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.15-1.38, p=<0.001). Each one-unit increment in the C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI) was associated with a 26% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.15-1.38, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: