Key result
ADA risk score outperforms IDRS for predicting diabetes with an AUC of 0.79.
Why the study?
Does the ADA risk score predict diabetes better than the IDRS among healthcare professionals?
Cross-Sectional (n=170)
No
Does the ADA risk score predict diabetes better than the IDRS among healthcare professionals?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ADA risk scoring system demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity compared to the IDRS in predicting undiagnosed diabetes among healthcare professionals.
A bstract Background: Diabetes mellitus is a major health problem which is responsible for significant mortality and morbidity. So we aimed to identify high-risk population and diagnose diabetes or pre-diabetes among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in a tertiary care hospital. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was done among 170 nondiabetic subjects from healthcare staff (doctors, nurses, and technologists). They were divided into two groups, each containing 85 people. In one group, risk assessment was done according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) risk score, and another group was assessed according to the Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS). The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) testing were done in all subjects to find out the glycemic status. Results: According to the ADA risk scoring system 3.50% of people were at high risk, 43.52% were overweight, and 15.30% were found to be diabetic. In the IDRS group, 23.50% of people were at high risk, 37.60% were overweight, and 17.60% were diabetic. Among doctors, the highest number of diabetes (10.58%) cases were diagnosed ( P = 0.00). A significant positive correlation was found between age and body mass index (BMI) ( P = 0.02), HbA1C and BMI ( P = 0.00), and waist circumference and HbA1C ( P = 0.03). In predicting diabetes, the ADA risk score (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68–0.90, P = 0.00) with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 75% was found to be better than IDRS (AUC: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57–0.81, P = 0.00) with a sensitivity of 72.50% and specificity of 60.10% in the receiver operating curve(ROC) analysis. Conclusion: HCPs are at increasing risk of developing diabetes. The ADA risk scoring system is better than IDRS in predicting diabetes and pre-diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anar et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Diabetes mellitus (n=170). ADA risk score vs. Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) was evaluated on Predicting diabetes (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.90, p=0.00). The ADA risk score was better than the IDRS in predicting diabetes among healthcare professionals (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.90 vs AUC 0.69; P=0.00).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: