Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates the role of local sports communities in shaping urban governance through data participation, indicating a new approach to collaborative decision-making.
This study investigates the overlooked yet pivotal role of local sports communities (LSCs) as data agents in the collaborative governance of urban public spaces. Rather than framing citizens’ leisure sports solely as intervention, we develop a triadic framework, comprising Governance Structure, Data Production, and Decision Mediation, to analyze how LSCs generate, manage, and translate data for urban governance. Three integration patterns are identified through the theory-informed case studies ( n = 12). The findings show that LSCs function with multifaceted roles, providing trust and legitimacy, generating grounded data, and mobilizing narratives to shape governance pathways. Ultimately, we conclude with a Quadrant Model to map LSCs’ embeddedness along the axes of institutional legitimacy and grassroots agency, offering a diagnostic tool for tracing the evolution from data silos to active data agency. The study contributes to debates on data-driven urbanism, collaborative governance, and leisure sports.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: