Mortgage securitization and neighborhood housing stability: Evidence from New York and California

Saverio Iaconis

doi:10.24052/ijbed/v14is02/art-03

July 17, 2026International Journal of Business and Economic DevelopmentOpen Access

Mortgage securitization and neighborhood housing stability: Evidence from New York and California

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The aim is to compare the impacts of private-label and government-sponsored mortgage securitization on housing stability.
Comparison of private-label and government-sponsored enterprise securitization channels.
Evaluation of housing outcomes across different legal foreclosure regimes.
No statistically detectable association between private-label securitization and housing stability.
Government-sponsored enterprise securitization showed similar results with no significant effects on housing outcomes.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Abstract

The analysis compares private-label securitization with government-sponsored enterprise securitization and evaluates how these channels correlate with housing outcomes across different legal foreclosure regimes. The results show no statistically detectable association between pri

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Saverio Iaconis (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5c6a40118b92953e3ee5b2 https://doi.org/10.24052/ijbed/v14is02/art-03

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Mortgage securitization and neighborhood housing stability: Evidence from New York and California

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Mortgage securitization and neighborhood housing stability: Evidence from New York and California

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading