Comprehensive approach maps adiabatic transitions in Jupiter's radiation belt, indicating new risks for spacecraft.
The dynamics of energetic charged particles in Jupiter's inner magnetosphere are governed by the conservation of adiabatic invariants, yet the transition to non-adiabatic motion has not been systematically quantified across particle energy, M-shell, and pitch angle. Prior work relies on an empirical gyro-radius threshold (rL<1000~km) tested at only two M-shells, leaving the intermediate, partially adiabatic regime uncharacterized. We develop a fully relativistic, three-dimensional test-particle model (Boris pusher) coupled to the JRM33 and Con2020 magnetic field models to investigate ultra-relativistic proton dynamics in Jupiter's inner radiation belt.A simulation design experiment encompassing 135 simulations (five energies,1--100~GeV; nine M-shells, 3--7~RJ; three pitch angles, alpha₀=30^∘,60^∘,89^∘) was performed, yielding three formally defined regimes: fully adiabatic, partially adiabatic, and fully non-adiabatic. The Boris pusher is found to be more reliable for long-term invariant studies compared to the Runge-Kutta scheme. A field-geometric curvature parameter, κ=(Rc/rL)1/2, to be effective in adiabaticity break down criteria which is validated via simulations. It is found that the adiabatic--partial boundary shifts to lower energy with increasing M-shell and pitch angle; at M=6.0\,RJ, even 1~GeV protons exceed the gyro-radius threshold, and the partially adiabatic regime is most prominent at $M=3.0$--4.5\,RJ for 1--10~GeV. The transitional zone for 10--20~GeV protons overlaps substantially with the interchange-event range reported from independent electron pitch-angle observations, suggesting a shared association with reduced magnetic confinement in this region. These results provide a validated, framework, with direct relevance to the radiation hazard environment for future Jovian spacecraft missions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: