Medical progress is possible only because altruistic volunteers put themselves at risk in clinical trials. The results of those trials are then used to inform medical decisions. The traditional system of relying on investigators, sponsors, and journal editors to decide whether, when, and how to report trial results was based on trust. There was no way to know what trials had been conducted, what data were collected, how they were analyzed, and whether the reported data were complete and accurate. Policies mandating the registration of trials and the reporting of summary results were instituted to provide greater transparency. In turn, . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deborah A. Zarin (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: