Key result
A Support Vector Machine model accurately predicted descending thoracic aortic diameters with a mean square error of less than 2 mm², with approximately 90% of predicted diameter errors being less than 2 mm.
Why the study?
Models were needed to predict descending thoracic aortic diameters to provide evidence for selecting stent graft sizes in TBAD patients.
Can machine learning models accurately predict descending thoracic aortic diameter to guide stent graft sizing in patients with type B aortic dissection?
Observational (n=200)
No
Can machine learning models accurately predict descending thoracic aortic diameter to guide stent graft sizing in patients with type B aortic dissection?
Machine learning models using CTA data can accurately predict descending thoracic aortic diameters, potentially guiding stent graft sizing to reduce TEVAR complications like distal stent-graft induced new entry (dSINE).
Background: To establish models for predicting descending thoracic aortic diameters and provide evidence for selecting the size of the stent graft for TBAD patients. Methods: A total of 200 candidates without severe deformation of aorta were included. CTA information was collected and 3D reconstructed. In the reconstructed CTA, a total of 12 cross-sections of peripheral vessels were made perpendicular to the axis of flow of the aorta. Parameters of the cross sections and basic clinical characteristics were used for prediction. The data was randomly split into the training set and the test set in an 8:2 ratio. To fully describe diameters of descending thoracic aorta, three predicted points were set based quadrisection, and a total of 12 models at three predicted points were established using four algorithms included linear regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), Extra-Tree regression (ETR) and random forest regression (RFR). The performance of models was evaluated by mean square error (MSE) of the prediction value, and the ranking of feature importance was given by Shapley value. After modeling, prognosis of five TEVAR cases and stent oversizing were compared. In patients with dSINE, stent oversizing was about 3 mm, while only 1 mm in patients without complications. Conclusion: The predictive models established by machine learning revealed the relationship between basic characteristics and diameters of different segment of descending aorta, which help to provide evidence for selecting the matching distal size of the stent for TBAD patients, thereby reducing the incidence of TEVAR complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Without severe deformation of aorta (n=200). Support Vector Machine (SVM) predictive model vs. Actual measured diameter was evaluated on Mean square error (MSE) of the predicted descending thoracic aortic diameter. A Support Vector Machine model accurately predicted descending thoracic aortic diameters with a mean square error of less than 2 mm², with approximately 90% of predicted diameter errors being less than 2 mm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: