Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates how senior managers’ cognitive capabilities influence organizational ambidexterity—the ability to balance exploration and exploitation—in dynamic environments. Using mixed-methods research with 245 managers across 89 Tunisian organizations and 12 in-depth case studies, we found that cognitive flexibility was the strongest predictor of ambidextrous performance, followed by human and social capital diversity. Strategic decision-making quality partially mediated these relationships, with effects amplified in highly dynamic environments. We identified five mechanisms through which individual cognition aggregates to organizational capabilities: perspective integration, cognitive resource allocation, adaptive learning, network leverage, and decision process enhancement. Building on recent work on innovation microfoundations and entrepreneurial capabilities, our findings extend understanding of how individual-level characteristics create organizational capabilities in emerging markets. For practitioners, our findings provide actionable guidance for leadership selection, cognitive diversity development, and decision-making process improvement—particularly valuable for organizations in emerging markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohamed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: