Key result
TEE-guided electrical cardioversion in the emergency department significantly reduced time to cardioversion (1.04 vs 3.81 days; P<0.001) and hospital length of stay compared to the cardiology ward.
Why the study?
Emergency medicine literature primarily addresses AF cardioversion in patients presenting within 48 hours or on anticoagulation, leaving outcomes unclear for non-anticoagulated patients presenting after 48 hours managed with TEE-guided cardioversion in the ED versus a cardiology ward.
Does transesophageal echocardiogram-guided electrical cardioversion in the emergency department reduce time to cardioversion and length of hospital stay compared to the cardiology ward in patients with atrial fibrillation >48 hours?
Observational (n=151)
Does transesophageal echocardiogram-guided electrical cardioversion in the emergency department reduce time to cardioversion and length of hospital stay compared to the cardiology ward in patients with atrial fibrillation >48 hours?
Performing TEE-guided electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation >48 hours in the emergency department rather than the cardiology ward significantly reduces time to cardioversion and hospital length of stay without increasing complications.
ED cardioversion associated with shorter delays; leaves open prospective validation of safety/efficacy in non-anticoagulated AF >48h.
BACKGROUND: The current emergency medicine literature on cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF) describes its performance on those who are hemodynamically unstable, present within 48 hours of the onset of the arrhythmia, or are on long-term anticoagulants. For patients who are not anticoagulated and present with atrial fibrillation for more than 48 hours, one option is to perform a transesophageal echocardiogram and then synchronized cardioversion in the absence of atrial clot. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with atrial fibrillation (AF) of more than 48 hours who underwent a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) and subsequent cardioversion in the ED versus the cardiology ward. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparison study of patients who presented to the ED with AF for more than 48 hours, underwent a transesophageal echocardiogram, and then were electrically cardioverted either in the emergency department or in the cardiology ward. Outcomes include: time to cardioversion, length of hospital stay, rate of successful cardioversion, and rate of complications. RESULTS: Electrical cardioversion was performed in the ED on 94 patients (62%) and the cardiology ward on 57 (38%). Over 90% of cardioversions were successful in both groups. Time to cardioversion was significantly less in the ED group versus the cardiology group (1.04 ± 0.9 days versus 3.81 ± 1.9; P < .001). Similarly, the mean length of hospital stay was less for the ED group (1.6 ± 1.6 days versus 7.3 ± 3.5; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients who present in atrial fibrillation for more than 48 hours and then have a TEE undergo electrical cardioversion faster in the ED compared with the cardiology ward. This clinical pathway also results in a shorter length of hospital stay without having more side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaro et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation >48 hours (n=151). Electrical cardioversion in the emergency department vs. Electrical cardioversion in the cardiology ward was evaluated on Time to cardioversion (days) (p=<.001). TEE-guided electrical cardioversion in the emergency department significantly reduced time to cardioversion (1.04 vs 3.81 days; P<0.001) and hospital length of stay compared to the cardiology ward.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: