Rethinking the cilia hypothesis of hydrocephalus

Dysfunction of motile cilia in ependymal cells has been proposed to be a pathogenic cause of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) overaccumulation leading to ventricular expansion in hydrocephalus, primarily based on observations of enlarged ventricles in mouse models of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Here, we review human and animal evidence that warrants a rethinking of the cilia hypothesis in hydrocephalus. First, we discuss neuroembryology and physiology data that do not support a role for ependymal cilia as the primary propeller of CSF movement across the ventricles in the human brain, particularly during in utero development prior to the functional maturation of ependymal cilia. Second, we highlight that in contrast to mouse models, motile ciliopathies infrequently cause hydrocephalus in humans. Instead, gene mutations affecting motile cilia function impact not only ependymal cilia but also motile cilia found in other organ systems outside of the brain, causing a clinical syndrome of recurrent respiratory infections and situs inversus, symptoms that do not typically accompany most cases of human hydrocephalus. Finally, we postulate that certain cases of hydrocephalus associated with ciliary gene mutations may arise not necessarily just from loss of cilia-generated CSF flow but also from altered neurodevelopment, given the potential functions of ciliary genes in signaling and neural stem cell fate beyond generating fluid flow. Further investigations are needed to clarify the link between motile cilia, CSF physiology, and brain development, the understanding of which has implications for the care of patients with hydrocephalus and other related neurodevelopmental disorders.