Key result
The QardioArm device demonstrated high reliability and validity for measuring blood pressure and heart rate, passing all European Society of Hypertension International Protocol standards.
Why the study?
Does the QardioArm mobile app provide reliable and valid blood pressure and heart rate measurements compared to the Omron M3 in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=100)
No
Does the QardioArm mobile app provide reliable and valid blood pressure and heart rate measurements compared to the Omron M3 in healthy volunteers?
Effect estimate: r > 0.96
p-value: p=<0.001
The QardioArm mobile app provides valid and reliable blood pressure and heart rate measurements meeting the European Society of Hypertension standards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports QardioArm validation in healthy volunteers; leaves open clinical adoption pending patient studies.
Mazoteras‐Pardo et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=100). QardioArm vs. Omron M3 was evaluated on Concordance of blood pressure and heart rate measurements (r > 0.96, p=<0.001). The QardioArm device demonstrated high reliability and validity for measuring blood pressure and heart rate, passing all European Society of Hypertension International Protocol standards.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: