Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To describe fecundity in female survivors of childhood cancer and consider the correlation with quality of life (QOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1744 women treated for childhood cancer before the age of 15 years at one of eight French cancer treatment centers between 1948 and 1992, 1187 who were alive in 2005 were sent a self-administered questionnaire, including questions about health status, QOL (MOS SF-36), and fecundity. A standardized fecundity ratio (SFR) was calculated (SFR: observed/expected number of children) for each individual based on a national reference. RESULTS: ) than in Germ cell (0.46; p = 0.03) or Sympathetic Nervous System tumors (0.79; p = 0.02). The average QOL motor score was 72.5 ± 19.5, and the average mental score was 61.4 ± 16.7. After adjusting for age, pathology, and self-reported sequelae in the questionnaires, it was determined that SF-36 mental (p = 0.002) and motor (p < 0.0002) scores correlated positively with fecundity, and SF-36 scores correlated negatively with locomotor late effects (p < 0.0001), growth insufficiency (p = 0.002), and psychological disorders (p < 0.001). Gonadal insufficiency was correlated with neither motor nor mental scores. CONCLUSION: Women treated for childhood cancer demonstrated impaired fecundity that correlated with poor QOL, as registered by the SF-36. Patients should be warned of the risk of impaired fecundity early during the follow-up. If possible, preservation of fertility should be prioritized at initiation of therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thouvenin‐Doulet et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: