Why the study?
To evaluate the utility of the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SnapShot Freeze 2.0, SSF2) for demonstrating the aortic annulus on pre-TAVI cardiac CT.
Does the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) improve the demonstration of the aortic annulus on cardiac CT in patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to standard reconstruction?
Observational (n=90)
Double-blind
No
Does the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) improve the demonstration of the aortic annulus on cardiac CT in patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to standard reconstruction?
p-value: p=<0.01
The SSF2 motion correction algorithm significantly improves image quality and reduces motion artifacts of the aortic annulus on pre-TAVI cardiac CT, particularly in patients with intermediate or high heart rates.
May enhance aortic annulus visualization on pre-TAVI CT; leaves open need for prospective outcome validation.
Purpose To investigate the usefulness of the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SnapShot Freeze 2.0, SSF2) for demonstrating the aortic annulus at pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation cardiac CT. Method We retrospectively analyzed 90 patients with severe aortic stenosis who had undergone cardiac CT on a 256-row CT scanner. The patients were divided into the 3 groups based on their heart rate during the scan (low, < 60 bpm, n = 30; intermediate, 60-69 bpm, n = 30; high, >70 bpm, n = 30). Image datasets were obtained at 40% and 75% of the R-R interval using standard and SSF2 reconstruction. The edge rise distance (ERD) on the CT attenuation profile of the aortic annulus was compared on images subjected to standard- and SSF2 reconstructions. The standard deviations (SD) of area and perimeter were compared using the F -test. The image quality was assessed by two observers using a 5-point Likert score. Results In patients with intermediate and high heart rates, the ERD was significantly shorter on SSF2- than standard reconstructed images (p < 0.01). The SD of area and perimeter were significantly smaller in SSF2 reconstruction than in standard (all: p < 0.05). Except for R-R interval 75% in patients with low heart rate (p = 0.54), the image quality scores were significantly higher for images reconstructed with SSF2 than standard (p < 0.01). Conclusions For the demonstration of the aortic annulus in patients with high heart rate or a 40% R-R interval, SSF2- was superior to standard reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumoto et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=90). SnapShot Freeze 2.0 (SSF2) reconstruction vs. Standard reconstruction was evaluated on Edge rise distance (ERD) on the CT attenuation profile of the aortic annulus (p=<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: