Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective cohort study identifies serum TGF-β1 and MCP-1 as prognostic biomarkers in IgA nephropathy, suggesting personalized treatment approaches.
Background IgA nephropathy (IgAN) exhibits a highly variable clinical course. As responses to immunosuppressive therapy remain inconsistent, reliable prognostic markers are critically required to identify patients who can show a good response to immunosuppressive treatments. Methods This prospective cohort study enrolled adults with biopsy-proven IgAN from 2010-2020. Good prognosis was defined as a ≥50% reduction in the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (uPCR) or <0.5 g/g with preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate 1 year after biopsy. Serum and urine cytokines/chemokines (TGF-β1, MCP-1, RANTES, and VEGF) and intrarenal CD45 + , CD3 + , CD20 + , and Ki-67 + cells were analyzed. Results Among the 202 patients, 120 (59.4%) had a good prognosis and showed a significantly lower risk of end-stage kidney disease over a 10-year follow-up. Multivariable analyses identified immunosuppressive therapy, low histologic grade, lower uPCR, absence of hypertension, higher serum TGF-β1 levels, and reduced intrarenal CD45 + and CD3 + cell infiltration as independent predictors of good prognosis. Among patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, higher serum TGF-β1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.31) and lower serum MCP-1 (aOR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97–1.00) independently predicted good prognosis, whereas less intrarenal CD20 + cell infiltration (aOR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07–0.73) independently predicted good prognosis in patients receiving supportive care only. Conclusions Serum TGF-β1 and MCP-1 levels may serve as biomarkers of favorable prognosis among patients with IgAN receiving immunosuppressive therapy, whereas intrarenal CD20 + cell infiltration may reflect poor prognosis under supportive care. Integrating serum cytokine profiles and tissue immune signatures may help inform individualized treatment decisions for IgAN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: