Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The Chattisgarh Basin of east central India and many unmetamorphosed Proterozoic sedimentary basins of Peninsular India have been considered mostly Neoproterozoic (1000–545 Ma) in age. A newly recognized succession of rhyolitic ignimbrite, ash beds, and volcaniclastic sandstones near the top of the ∼2. 2‐km‐thick sedimentary fill of the Chattisgarh Basin is a chronostratigraphic marker. Euhedral igneous zircons from these units give U‐Pb SHRIMP ages of 990–1020 Ma, indicating that the basin fill beneath this marker horizon is pre‐Neoproterozoic. On the basis of newly reported zircon ages of 1631 5 Ma from the basal part of the Vindhyan Basin and accepting the consensus that all virtually undeformed and unmetamorphosed craton‐interior Proterozoic sedimentary basins in peninsular India are approximately coeval, we conclude that these basins are approximately Mesoproterozoic (1600–1000 Ma) in age. The reassigned age for these rocks (1650 to 900 or possibly ∼1000 Ma), up to 500 Ma in variance with the current notion (∼1100 to ∼518 Ma; Naqvi 2005), calls for a thorough rethinking of contemporary models concerning tectonics, sedimentation, and other geological activity that affected the Indian shield in the Proterozoic Era.
Patranabis‐Deb et al. (Tue,) studied this question.