Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial shows the effectiveness of fosfomycin for complicated urinary tract infections caused by MDR-GNB, suggesting its importance in treatment.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the last decade, an increasing interest in using fosfomycin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative (MDR-GNB) infections have been registered, especially when none or only a few other active alternatives remained available. RECENT FINDINGS: Fosfomycin may remain active against a considerable proportion of MDR-GNB. In observational studies, a possible curative effect of oral fosfomycin monotherapy has been described for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) and bacterial prostatitis caused by MDR-GNB, whereas intravenous fosfomycin has been mostly used in combination with other agents for various type of severe MDR-GNB infections. The ZEUS randomized controlled trial (RCT) has started to provide high-level evidence about the possible use of fosfomycin for complicated UTI caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing GNB, but no results of large RCT are currently available to firmly guide the use of fosfomycin for carbapenem-resistant GNB. SUMMARY: Fosfomycin is an important therapeutic option for MDR-GNB infections. Further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and clinical research is needed to optimize its use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bassetti et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: