Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and predictability of the Visian implantable collamer lens with a central port in patients aged between 45 and 55 years. SETTING: Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density (ECD), vault, and adverse events over a 1-year period were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 87 eyes (49 patients) were evaluated. The mean postoperative UDVA and CDVA were 0.82 ± 0.24 and 0.93 ± 0.12, respectively. Seventy-eight eyes (approximately 90%) achieved a CDVA of 20/25 or greater. No eye lost 1 or more lines, 53 eyes (60.92%) did not change, 15 eyes (17.24%) gained 1 line, and 19 eyes (21.84%) gained 2 lines or more of CDVA. The efficacy and safety indexes were 0.95 and 1.08, respectively. Seventy-eight eyes (89.65%) were within ±0.50 diopter (D) of the desired sphere refraction, and all eyes (100%) were within ±1.00 D. Fifty eyes (57.7%) showed a spherical equivalent within ±0.13 D. The mean postoperative IOP was 13.58 ± 1.79 mm Hg, and no significant rise (>18 mm Hg) occurred during the follow-up. The largest proportion of eyes (35.63%) reported a reduction in IOP by 1 to 2 mm Hg. Postoperative mean ECD was 2574 ± 362 cells/mm2 (0.41% loss from the preoperative baseline). The mean postoperative vault was 398 ± 187 μm, being the most prevalent range from 201 to 300 μm (22.89% of eyes). No adverse events were reported during the study. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes reported in this study support the use of this lens in older patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfonso et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: