PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2003Journal of Family Psychology183 citationsOpen Access

Categories and continua of destructive and constructive marital conflict tactics from the perspective of U.S. and Welsh children.

View Full Paper
MGMarcie C. Goeke‐MoreyECE. Mark CummingsGHGordon T. Harold

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Categories and continua of parents' marital conflict tactics based on multiple, conceptually grounded criteria were tested. Participants were 175 U.S. children, ages 8-16 years (88 boys, 87 girls) and 327 Welsh children, ages 11-12 years (159 boys, 168 girls). Children's responses (affective, cognitive, behavioral) to analog presentations of 10 everyday marital conflict tactics enacted by fathers or mothers showed substantial variation as a function of tactic used. Orderings of conflict tactics on the various response criteria varied as a function of moderators, particularly the gender of the parent expressing the conflict tactic. Conflict tactics were classified as either constructive or destructive according to criteria derived from the emotional security hypothesis. Except for calm discussion, classifications did not change regardless of cultural group, parent gender, or child age or gender. Recommendations for negotiating everyday marital conflict for the children's sake are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Goeke‐Morey et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5da5ec1eb962e53e89dd79https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.17.3.327
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper