Theoretical framework explains anomalies in cosmology using a multiverse model with topological dynamics.
This paper presents the "Mycelium Cosmology", a novel theoretical framework that conceptualizes the multiverse as a dynamic, directed graph network of interconnected spacetimes. Rooted in the principles of Cosmological Natural Selection, Brane Cosmology, and the Einstein-Cartan Theory, the model postulates that universes are coupled via higher-dimensional topological wormhole edges. Black holes act as input nodes, funneling elementary quantum building blocks through the bulk into daughter universes via white holes, initiating spatial expansion through topological fluid dynamics. By translating the accelerated expansion of the universe into a time-dependent net flow equation (ΔΦ), the framework provides mechanistic resolutions to several of standard cosmology's most pressing anomalies: The Hubble Tension is explained as a real, measurable hydrodynamic fluctuation in the incoming bulk flow. Dark Matter is structurally separated: Macroscopic phenomena (e.g., the Great Attractor) are modeled as gravitational deformations from adjacent parallel branes, while local galactic dark matter is modeled as an uncondensed, primordial quantum superfluid that dictates rotation curves. Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry and the CMB "Axis of Evil" are explained via a topological symmetry breaking process (a "primordial mass spectrometer") driven by rotating Kerr-singularities within the bulk edge. The Entropy Paradox is solved as the extreme bottleneck of the wormhole edge forces incoming matter into a near-zero entropy Bose-Einstein condensate, providing the exact low initial entropy required for a new universe. The paper concludes with specific, testable predictions for future observations (e.g., via JWST and gravitational wave detectors) to empirically verify or falsify the framework. Note: This document is a bilingual edition. The full English translation is provided first, followed by the original German manuscript.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eric Janke (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: