Key result
In stable convalescing patients after a first myocardial infarction, non-Q-wave infarction was associated with a similar rate of subsequent cardiac events compared to Q-wave infarction (16.7% vs 15.7%; P=0.29).
Why the study?
Do non-invasive ischemic tests predict subsequent cardiac events in stable convalescing patients after first myocardial infarction?
Population
549 stable, convalescing patients after their first Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 23 months
Authors
Loading...
Similar post-MI risk after Q- and non-Q-wave events supports uniform surveillance; leaves open whether ischemic testing improves risk stratification.
Cohort (n=549)
Do non-invasive ischemic tests predict subsequent cardiac events in stable convalescing patients after first myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 16.7% vs 15.7%
p-value: p=0.29
In stable patients convalescing from a first MI, clinical factors like post-infarction angina and diabetes are strong predictors of future cardiac events, whereas routine non-invasive ischemic testing does not provide additional prognostic value.
Zareba et al. (1994) conducted a cohort in First Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (n=549). Non-Q-wave myocardial infarction vs. Q-wave myocardial infarction was evaluated on Cardiac events (unstable angina requiring hospitalization, non-fatal reinfarction, or death from cardiac causes) (p=0.29). In stable convalescing patients after a first myocardial infarction, non-Q-wave infarction was associated with a similar rate of subsequent cardiac events compared to Q-wave infarction (16.7% vs 15.7%; P=0.29).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: