Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates symptom detection in clinical encounters, highlighting LLM effectiveness for patient understanding.
Objectives: To develop a pipeline for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on the task of capturing symptoms from clinical encounters. Materials and Methods: We created a gold standard dataset of symptom annotations from simulated doctor-patient encounter excerpts (264 encounters; 16 symptoms; double-coded and adjudicated). Nine different LLMs from 4 vendors (OpenAI, Meta, DeepSeek, Moonshot AI) were used as examples to test our evaluation pipeline; outputs were assessed for correct structure and symptom information. Results: Of 3085 excerpts, 2087 (68%) contained symptoms. Pain, cough, and shortness of breath were most common; LLMs achieved F1 scores ranging 0.66-0.88 for these symptoms with minimal prompt engineering. Of tested models, GPT-4.1 demonstrated the best overall performance. Discussion: Our evaluation pipeline and benchmarking dataset are publicly available and applicable to various LLMs, including open-source models. Conclusion: This work supports the development and optimization of models that seek to improve patient symptom understanding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: