Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article aims to make conceptual room for a view about political legitimacy called the power-liability account. The view claims that political legitimacy is a form of normative power that entails moral liability, but not necessarily a moral claim-right that entails moral duty. The power-liability account supports appealing interpretations of justified civil disobedience in the face of legitimate but unjust law at home and of justified human rights interventions that violate legitimate international law abroad. I argue here only for the conceptual possibility of this view, not for its normative correctness. I believe that the power-liability view indeed is correct, but it often is thought that the view not only is false but also incoherent. Many hold that entailed duty and immunity are built into the meaning of the concept of political legitimacy. My task is to loosen these conceptual strictures. Among the important concepts that political philosophers argue about, few are as protean as legitimacy. All of our normative concepts are matters of vigorous and, one hopes, fruitful disagreement. But often enough, for a time, we gain clarity about what the disagreement is about. So, though we might disagree about what distributive justice demands—who falls within the scope of its claims, what goods and freedoms are subject to it, and what are the correct principles of just distribution—we might agree that distributive justice is about who has a moral entitlement to which goods and freedoms under conditions of scarcity or conflicting interests. When it comes to arguments about legitimacy, however, there is less agreement about what we are disagreeing about. Rawls draws the well-known distinction between concept and conception, where a concept marks off the arena of a disputed idea that is filled, through normative argument, by conflicting conceptions with different content, criteria, or conditions.1 Without some conceptual analysis, understood as the exercise of marking off apt boundaries for fruitful argument, there are two ways an argument might misfire: if we are too loose in specifying a concept, we risk talking past each other; if we are too strict, we risk begging the normative question. The distinction between a concept and its conceptions is not hard and fast. It might shift over time as ideas get settled and then unsettled again. It might shift in the course of a single conversation, as we struggle to clarify where we disagree, and make judgments about whether, for a particular question, ordinary linguistic usage is more or less illuminating than stipulative definition, or whether highly moralized thick terms are more or less useful than relatively thin descriptions. The test of an aptly drawn concept is its fruitfulness, which in part is a matter of steering between the twin risks of engaging in merely verbal disputes and of assuming one's conclusion. In specifying the concept of legitimacy fruitfully, and in distinguishing the concept from its various conceptions, we might begin with the rough notion that the concept of legitimacy is about the right to rule. Various conceptions of legitimacy differ on what the necessary and sufficient conditions are for A to have the right to rule B in some context C, and differ on what the reasons are for such conditions. But neither having a right nor ruling are transparent notions. Is the right to rule a claim-right that entails a moral duty to obey, or a mere liberty? Is the right of a legitimate ruler conclusory, or merely presumptive? Does ruling involve legislating, commanding, instructing, advising, arranging incentives, coercing, or forcing? What kinds of entities have or to have the of Does legitimacy in or is it a the for legitimacy necessarily to of or Is legitimacy an only an the for legitimacy necessarily to the or the of subject to legitimate that only who are to or who have the of is legitimacy to normative ideas such as and might at that of these at the of the concept, different under different But is this not too to In ordinary we and but some notion of these not might hold that a in of its legitimacy, has as a to international an entitlement to by the right to and its immunity from and the normative power to moral on its But hold that a legitimate is one that is justified in a legitimate ruler is a a legitimate ruler a just The of legitimacy these to into whether agree about what are disagreeing about. The of to to different I that a is a to the I not have a disagreement with the concept of legitimacy from our view the about legitimacy. The view is that legitimacy entails two normative the moral of by the ruler to obey, and the moral immunity of the ruler from in the exercise and of legitimate rule. this view, it is to hold that an is but that subject to the are not to with its or that are not from the legitimate from its legitimate that legitimate not necessarily is that not one important of this view, claims that legitimacy is the of various political as a or it is a necessary for a to legitimate with to that then indeed a not between legitimacy and to what the subject if not to political But the of the is not a conceptual of the view that a ruler is legitimate if and only if has by the one is a but not a view understood as a normative of legitimacy. that conceptions of what a particular legitimate with to particular from not from of what the of what the for the exercise of by the to I agree that legitimate is not merely justified and is correct that a account of legitimacy particular to particular But it not that to is the only to make this It is a in conceptual to the of a concept that is useful and if we not we risk two The is to a disagreement as a The is to moral arguments too as In this the indeed is too the exercise of legitimate moral this is for moral legitimate have it is not an is the who has the for a conceptual between legitimate and has to a on has that the exercise of legitimate by an entails some in the normative or of having from merely having a moral to one of having the to in the of not legitimate over When we legitimate we to the more than merely a or that this power is the power to I is right that legitimate is more than mere and it is a of to that this more is the power to the normative of But there ways that legitimate the normative of from normative of then room is for the view that legitimate law is not and that the law in some its for civil legitimate entails a duty to obey, civil disobedience as a moral the is disobedience is not by disobedience is then the that is have The account of civil disobedience as an that for and to the of a just that has of its on the view, When disobedience is the that is is not is not and is a for of such as or moral reasons to from but if disobedience is for is not civil disobedience the conditions that it are to an important form of between and then that there is some to a between legitimate and moral The to that is to that the power of a legitimate to the normative of the subject is not necessarily the power to But what that power get at what I is the correct conceptual account of legitimacy, we to to the well-known that in the that A have in to of B in to A has a right more a B has a duty to if A has a or or with to B has if A has a power with to B a from and if A has an immunity from B has a with to also has its having a claim-right is the of having a is the of a a power is the of a and an immunity is the of a to the between with some it between moral concepts as if A has a moral claim-right then B has a moral duty to the and are in legitimacy is a of moral the power to and I not and A legitimate has the moral power to or rights and and and and of that the and or of In what the exercise of this moral power the moral or of the is correct, A has a moral power with to and B of an B an or some to then B have moral What is this It is that moral claims some subject or the legitimate A by might gain a moral not to if B is not with a moral duty to such by and B subject to justified of its to A or to But a moral is not a moral and an duty is not a moral duty. that the exercise of legitimate the normative of the subject of that is B is subject to a moral justified of moral claims and the justified of by It is not necessary if A legitimate in B an B has a moral duty to it is the that if A in B an B has an duty to It is part of view that law is a of the by justified or law and is whether are of moral The power-liability account whether are also moral is a to settled by moral argument in of are we to a moral that is not a moral that the of a is an the subject of legitimate has moral immunity the of rights and the exercise of by or the of and and this the of justified the subject When such are and by or are and the subject that the law is or but that the law is an of that has in one but not in if this is the of about right and that is the to a conceptual a legitimate law not a just not account for justified of legitimate law by that are or legitimate entails but not duty. the duty is only or or the of this it is not one that to legitimate in scope and over particular and but within its the of a legitimate is an that the reasons that for and the reasons that the conditions of legitimacy of the and the of its that and claims to reasons over which it has has not only to a it has in of its to at this one on such a a or then one also the that the merely or But is about the and legitimate not moral duty. we not then that legitimate entails or moral duty that is or by moral I has the correct account of of moral are for and but a if it is a is not or by a false we under which to But the correct to about these is that are built in from the The that supports the moral view is the of moral there moral is not in but I that it for in various ways to such is to between the of rights and the of are not but the right of a not to that right is is is to that the reasons that in of a duty are sufficient to a such as the duty to or A in of this is that our that the is in is than our that the of on the the the of a in a who into an and the to this to that the rights of the have for the But if for the of the from a for such the not have the The or or and are in not the to to than into the as than The power-liability account is it neither to the view that political legitimacy merely to a a moral to nor into the view that political legitimacy to a claim-right that entails a duty to The view that legitimate is merely a often is with the in a article by But view is more has power understood as a not a normative is the to make a what one and power is power sufficient to of a and from is the exercise of power the right to The right to rule is by who power and who have the of one to The right to rule is a a not a claim-right a duty to there is in the power-liability account that I have that or the power-liability view by not a on the for legitimacy of power its or on the of power and by the the only part of view that to here is that the right to rule merely is a this not make one's view I more on that The to is to that a moral power is more and not a a mere to but also to that a moral power is less and not an The argument for have that with legitimate not moral then legitimate not have moral merely have a moral to exercise So, legitimate is more than a to and if the have moral is the power a moral But what is this moral than the of moral rights and there is room for a view of legitimacy is merely a or it is a claim-right that entails is in The to this is that the of a right or duty by a power the normative of a subject of the right or duty by moral rights and and moral duty to the power has the power to these moral is moral such moral also to moral to exercise the moral to exercise are moral the exercise of power not moral rights and The we that the for having a justified to exercise an power that not moral rights and the of are less than the for having a moral power that the of and are not and the of by the in and political one to the idea of a moral power by such to moral to exercise an important distinction the that the power-liability view into the the of the normative of the exercise of through to the of by the or by some But only if the normative to which the subject of is to the of a duty on the subject to the moral with a duty not to with the exercise of the in some or by conceptual but by a of if the is not to that a mere from if A has the to in that not A over not a duty of B to with B exercise in a to the into for But B not over the to or the by a to the a mere at some of if the is to a in the of I for if B is an moral who then A not normative on B for to But in the is for moral not however, that its the of not have over the So, it is that on the power-liability view, the exercise of legitimate by A over B on B not only for and but also a duty not to of to and this not the power-liability view into the view of legitimacy. the exercise of normative power some that and some of but it not a duty to with the It is not to the power-liability view as an of legitimacy of the view and the view, that the exercise of legitimate that to is that a legitimate not a duty to with that This has some I the a legitimate moral power to the normative between two and the the moral power to and In a to the and are to or that on the are and are by and and that through the and the have by the for as as to get to the has one of these to a the the here right into the this is by only from this this particular has subject to in this have in that such are by and The which has by who a the to the with a from The with but the on and the and that on the and on is account of the on a the is not by the on a the is not by the moral of the as on is account of that the ruling is in that the have the not the of the that has the right to to the and that violate a duty if the the legitimate of the on view of what legitimate that the the moral power to rule as it and, though in one the is not in it has not its This is the of the has the moral to that is by the ruling and, in a that to is its and that the ruling normative What necessarily of a that law but of the of this that has a moral duty to the over the and the to as has My is not whether is a moral indeed whether is a conceptual view is that the ruling is but not about the concept of The on whether the moral power of the to normative and moral to such in a that not or in a moral duty to the the normative between and under the that to the a moral claim-right not to have and a moral duty not to might hold that the ruling that has the moral duty and the But there is possibility that as a in normative the ruling only a moral to the and only a moral to the we in the of is not might have a to the the and has a moral duty not to the and has a moral duty not to is to a or a not a or one of and But these are not the of that are for the view to the has off of the and that whether or is the one The has to a moral the right not to have claims that the has only it has in only a moral to to the of the to might have the law as normative and that is under a moral duty not to But has a more view of what but legitimate law I not for the moral of this I of the and that such of of the that from in our of the for to and the But the is a different is a conceptual in that the is a legitimate in that it has the moral power to normative that what moral claim-right is merely a moral but under the have the moral power to a moral The is that such conceptual that this not on the particular that that a of law is right over the by or that the of the not a conceptual if that is not of the of law is not in question. as that this account in on the view of that as has to the has to or what the exercise of the normative power has is the normative between the two and that the if in this merely of what the law for but not for international the normative of the to the is by it to a with to the What the has is the normative power to the normative that hold between the an of the power-liability view that to but the to mere by a at a at the of with of for of in The under a highly at a at a in the of and of a by the of has to under its with a and to on at It that this of is a the are to at and are to who to right at the just as the and from that is in for a It is a or are in on on a a and a which and but not the of not but that time, a hard at the on The of this is to the of legitimate but in the of not The which in this is are not to to the is to at and this to the to an of a law that is legitimate and But it is not to an that our about the moral to but legitimate I believe that there is such an and that a is I at it, by of for the of the is to make two that such an is conceptual of the legitimacy, but that legitimacy is not merely by justified under the has a moral duty not to on that is justified in and that to the Is this a of Does view that the and not have the moral power to have merely a moral and not have legitimate over that to the to a moral duty to the is hold that the has the moral power to that is to have not the moral power to a moral duty to this that to the from a moral argument, than a conceptual analysis, of what for legitimate law this is not a of civil such an argument make of the ideas in and civil the of to the a duty to just and the to as a of to the view, the exercise of legitimate has in that it to the moral duty that it to the moral to on an argument not but if it is it on moral not by a that is to from who moral to and only it is in to of legitimate to more than the But if and in moral are not that to in the time on normative view is that for legitimate law that one the for whether or but that there are under which there is moral duty to the law in the The of neither nor about legitimate whether in or The of are not if are merely as whether or under But some are or have mere and that this is not as if a moral to a the there is conceptual between legitimacy and duty that to that under particular legitimate that is subject to are not for moral but merely moral by a moral power to which is if is is not an by the the duty by the view is legitimate law on its a duty to or to the is of the duty that a to there is duty not to a there is a duty to the or to for This is a not a moral the moral the view that legitimate law entails a moral duty that has the the law or the the view into the in account the entailed moral duty from having such a that as a a duty have more law a moral duty to the or to the the or to to to the or not to to to or not to the of of in not only has the view the view, but it has also the view, and that that is with the and and and to or not a correct of the that law are not in in that two ways to with one's not to or to to if two ways to with one's to or to for if are there two ways to with one's not to or to moral the moral are not not with the moral and by and by I have if is correct about the in the law of this not the moral to the are not in and neither are moral at not the moral thought of as but one not of moral with the view that legitimate law entails a moral duty that the with the duty or the though is not the distinction between moral power and moral more who has merely a moral to not have a moral power to the normative A is a normative one has it or one or not to or and we have over and a is or or and it or A normative in is the to into or normative such as A power is a normative that is of normative it This distinction is the and the are the When are as is the with the and the it is more that the the normative of the and the The its moral power with to the the a moral a moral to the subject to having normative by such and is for is the to This is legitimate is through of argument by as the of the of The power the subject is In as mere the to the of to that subject to and are that subject to In legitimacy as normative the to the of have the power to make it the that are to that subject to I that that subject to This if the has to The of the not have the power to to have the have to it to the power to to but not have to the of what as the The power-liability view what is with the of by and with the what a have and this the of the of by have a get what have to through of these is not by the of and of if the from some we if the not for we have moral immunity from the exercise of is it that a we have the to an who for gain or over The subject is the power to which is is under the account that moral to moral to exercise that the subject is with to the the has to and the subject has the the two moral make of this When to on and to not view legitimate merely as entities that have moral some to normative the an moral to and then of and not moral by the and by the but such a to some of the conditions of and on the moral In on the power-liability view, the has an moral power to and is to that normative on that power is from the power of and the power to also it the power to normative between as the in have moral of to one that have in on the who the are under for on to with to judgments of The moral who on have moral but of a at that falls of the has moral about it for a to and an unjust or law on the that it is from the I from an unjust law and have not to a if I have the legitimate to But this that legitimacy is a from the and it the moral to unjust or moral whether and whether to it the of legitimacy there is disagreement about the justice or of an that to an legitimate is to that the of that have a moral duty to I hold that to an legitimate is to that the of that are not the exercise of a moral power to and and in ways that the normative face a moral duty as an question. What about the in international that a legitimate has immunity from if having a moral power is not the and not having a moral When A a moral power over and B an this B a justified to which is the of a moral immunity from B moral immunity from however, A not have moral immunity from the of some is conceptual from having moral having moral having immunity under international law having moral are that have to by moral argument, not conceptual such argument is that for and from the to of a political who have in a to to A political that to have just that the are and within about what justice are to I within the are by whether to by unjust the as if the to moral have to for I is to the that of to to the of but Among the for a are that its moral on its that human some of of and that the meaning that it for the right Rawls moral law that is unjust is to moral in It have to with and of the of justice in that sufficient to that from one to the to is by the of human of and for the right But if these conditions are the not to The not that have or but that but in of the of not to or or but not unjust to an that has a for from the of a and from of Rawls might to too however, that legitimate to an duty not a moral duty to the or the to the and of the the or the to the of legitimate but not to make the the of the and in moral to to justified civil disobedience a legitimate is not an if a account of in the under which are When this is it to for to on and moral immunity legitimacy and moral duty and duty and immunity and When and to unjust but legitimate from on What of are are and by the to an unjust but legitimate by but it at this than the by
Arthur Isak Applbaum (Tue,) studied this question.