In order to improve interdigitated back contact (IBC) solar cell efficiencies, the entire solar cell surface must be well passivated. Al 2 O 3 /SiN x :H and SiO 2 /SiN x :H passivation stacks have been widely adopted for high-efficiency silicon solar cells. We explored IBC solar cells with 1) only SiO 2 /SiN x :H; 2) only Al 2 O 3 /SiN x :H passivating both diffused surfaces; or 3) independent p + emitter and n + back surface field (BSF) passivation with Al 2 O 3 /SiN x :H and SiO 2 /SiN x :H respectively. First, stacks were optimized through simulation (using a device model in 3D Quokka) by varying the recombination parameter Jo. Second, solar cells were fabricated with a low-cost high-throughput screen-printing technique. Third, simulated J sc , V oc , F F , and η values closely matched the experimental results for passivation schemes 1 and 2. Passivation scheme 3 could not be realized experimentally due to fabrication difficulties, while its simulated values were 688 mV, 41.4 mA/cm 2 , 80.8%, and 23.0%, respectively. It is clear that independent passivation captures material advantages for each diffused region for enhanced solar cell performance compared with conventional passivation of both diffused regions with a single passivation stack.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: