Why the study?
HFpEF and AF commonly coexist with overlapping pathophysiology such as LA remodeling, which may differ due to distinct underlying mechanisms.
Does left atrial wall remodeling differ between patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
Observational (n=249)
Does left atrial wall remodeling differ between patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
Larger left atrial wall volume and wall thickness heterogeneity can distinguish AF from HFpEF alone, suggesting distinct pathophysiological mechanisms of LA remodeling.
LA wall metrics may aid phenotyping in coexisting AF and HFpEF; leaves open distinct mechanisms and therapeutic targeting.
Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist with overlapping pathophysiology like left atrial (LA) remodeling, which might differ given different underlying mechanisms. Objectives We sought to investigate the different patterns of LA wall remodeling in AF vs. HFpEF. Methods We compared LA wall characteristics including wall volume (LAWV), wall thickness (LAWT), and wall thickness heterogeneity (LAWT[SD]) and LA structure, function among the controls (without AF or HFpEF, n = 115), HFpEF alone ( n = 59), AF alone ( n = 37), and HFpEF+AF ( n = 38) groups using multi-detector computed tomography and echocardiography. Results LA wall remodeling was most predominant and peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) was worst in HFpEF+AF patients as compared to the rest. Despite lower E/e' (9.8 ± 3.8 vs. 13.4 ± 6.4) yet comparable LA volume, LAWT and PALS in AF alone vs. HFpEF alone, LAWV [12.6 (11.6–15.3) vs. 12.0 (10.2–13.7); p = 0.01] and LAWT(SD) [0.68 (0.61–0.71) vs. 0.60 (0.56–0.65); p < 0.001] were significantly greater in AF alone vs. HFpEF alone even after multi-variate adjustment and propensity matching. After excluding the HFpEF+AF group, both LAWV and LAWT [SD] provided incremental values when added to PALS or LAVi (all p for net reclassification improvement <0.05) in discriminating AF alone, with LAWT[SD] yielding the largest C-statistic (0.78, 95% CI: 0.70–0.86) among all LA wall indices. Conclusions Despite a similar extent of LA enlargement and dysfunction in HFpEF vs. AF alone, larger LAWV and LAWT [SD] can distinguish AF from HFpEF alone, suggesting the distinct underlying pathophysiological mechanism of LA remodeling in AF vs. HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuo et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (n=249). Atrial fibrillation alone vs. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) alone was evaluated on Left atrial wall thickness heterogeneity (LAWT[SD]) (C-statistic 0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.86, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: