Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 23, 2016BMC Pulmonary MedicineOpen Access

Infection biomarkers in primary care patients with acute respiratory tract infections–comparison of Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MMMarc MeiliUniversity of BaselAKAlexander KutzBrigham and Women's HospitalMBMatthias BrielUniversity Hospital of Basel

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Meili et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5dfc93e7c050b15fd89a9dhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0206-4
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessment of the Usefulness of Sputum Culture for Diagnosis of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Using the PORT Predictive Scoring System2004 · 218 citations
  2. 2Prognostic and diagnostic value of eosinopenia, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and circulating cell-free DNA in critically ill patients admitted with suspicion of sepsis2014 · 153 citations
  3. 3Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia1997 · 468 citations
  4. 4Value of soluble TREM-1, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein serum levels as biomarkers for detecting bacteremia among sepsis patients with new fever in intensive care units: a prospective cohort study2012 · 119 citations