Key result
A rule-based natural language processing algorithm identified hypertrophic cardiomyopathy diagnosis from cardiac magnetic resonance narrative text reports with an accuracy of 0.99.
Why the study?
Manual extraction of information from CMR reports is time-consuming, error-prone, and costly, prompting investigation into whether natural language processing can accurately extract HCM diagnoses.
Can a natural language processing system accurately extract hypertrophic cardiomyopathy diagnosis and classification concepts from cardiac magnetic resonance reports compared to manual annotation?
Can a natural language processing system accurately extract hypertrophic cardiomyopathy diagnosis and classification concepts from cardiac magnetic resonance reports compared to manual annotation?
An NLP system can accurately identify and classify hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from narrative cardiac magnetic resonance reports, potentially streamlining data extraction for research and clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is important for diagnosis and risk stratification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. However, collection of information from large numbers of CMR reports by manual review is time-consuming, error-prone and costly. Natural language processing (NLP) is an artificial intelligence method for automated extraction of information from narrative text including text in CMR reports in electronic health records (EHR). Our objective was to assess whether NLP can accurately extract diagnosis of HCM from CMR reports. METHODS: An NLP system with two tiers was developed for information extraction from narrative text in CMR reports; the first tier extracted information regarding HCM diagnosis while the second extracted categorical and numeric concepts for HCM classification. We randomly allocated 200 HCM patients with CMR reports from 2004 to 2018 into training (100 patients with 185 CMR reports) and testing sets (100 patients with 206 reports). RESULTS: NLP algorithms demonstrated very high performance compared to manual annotation. The algorithm to extract HCM diagnosis had accuracy of 0.99. The accuracy for categorical concepts included HCM morphologic subtype 0.99, systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve 0.96, mitral regurgitation 0.93, left ventricular (LV) obstruction 0.94, location of obstruction 0.92, apical pouch 0.98, LV delayed enhancement 0.93, left atrial enlargement 0.99 and right atrial enlargement 0.98. Accuracy for numeric concepts included maximal LV wall thickness 0.96, LV mass 0.99, LV mass index 0.98, LV ejection fraction 0.98 and right ventricular ejection fraction 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: NLP identified and classified HCM from CMR narrative text reports with very high performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dewaswala et al. (2022) studied Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=200). Rule-based Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm vs. Manual annotation (gold standard) was evaluated on Accuracy of extracting HCM diagnosis from CMR reports (Accuracy 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.00). A rule-based natural language processing algorithm identified hypertrophic cardiomyopathy diagnosis from cardiac magnetic resonance narrative text reports with an accuracy of 0.99.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: