This paper integrates the advantages of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy logic theory and develops a new approach for pavement condition assessment and project prioritization. Roughness, deflection, surface deterioration, rutting, and skid resistance are identified as five performance indicators for evaluating pavement condition. A survey is conducted among experienced professional engineers for establishing fuzzy membership functions of each performance indicator with respect to a fuzzy linguistic evaluation set Very good, Good, Fair, Poor, and Very poor using statistical regression. AHP is applied to determine weight from a paired-comparison matrix. Eventually the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is carried out using fuzzy relations, which combines a fuzzy evaluation of single performance indicators to the one simultaneously considering all five performance indicators. A maximum grade principle (MGP) and a defuzzified weighted cumulative index (DWCI) are proposed to assign a linguistic assessment result and a numerical assessment result, respectively, to the condition of a road segment. A case study is provided to rank eight road segments using MGP and DWCI. The proposed method offers a promising approach to the accuracy and reliability issues in the data collection and rating of pavement distress condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: