Key result
Postapproval usage of the Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric VAD in a real-world cohort resulted in a 77% rate of successful support compared to 90% in the IDE trial cohort (p=0.05).
Why the study?
Does postapproval 'real world' usage of the Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric VAD result in similar outcomes compared to the IDE trial cohort in pediatric patients?
Cohort (n=295)
Does postapproval 'real world' usage of the Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric VAD result in similar outcomes compared to the IDE trial cohort in pediatric patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 77% vs 90%
p-value: p=0.05
Postapproval real-world use of the Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric VAD in a less-ideal population resulted in slightly lower but still high rates of successful support compared to the IDE trial, with no increase in bleeding or neurologic events.
Supports continued Berlin Heart use in children; leaves open prospective validation in expanded populations.
The Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device (BH) was approved for use in the United States in December 2011, based on a prospective investigational device exemption (IDE) trial. Strict exclusion criteria for the trial selected a low-risk "ideal" cohort. We sought to determine whether postapproval usage of the BH in a "real world" cohort of recipients would result in similar outcomes. Preimplant diagnostic information was collected for all patients. Efficacy was evaluated by comparison of all children (efficacy group, n = 247) implanted between FDA approval and April 2015 to those in the IDE trial (IDE, n = 48), with regard to achievement of one of four end-states: transplanted, successful weaning, death/unsuccessful weaning, or still-on-device. Safety outcomes were compared between IDE patients and a subset of postapproval patients (safety group, n = 39) for whom adjudicated adverse events were tracked in a regulator-mandated dataset. Diagnostic categories were similar between groups: IDE (congenital 19%, dilated cardiomyopathy/myocarditis/other 81%) versus Efficacy Group (congenital 24%, dilated cardiomyopathy/myocarditis/other 75%). Patients in the IDE cohort were larger (median 14.8 kg, range 3.6-58.1 kg vs. 10.7 kg, 2.9-112.0 kg, p = 0.02). More IDE patients were successfully supported than in the efficacy group cohort (90% vs. 77%, p = 0.05). Proportions with bleeding and stroke were similar between the IDE and safety group cohorts (46% vs. 41%, p = 0.65; 29% vs. 33%, p = 0.68, respectively). With usage of the BH in a less-ideal population, rates of bridge to transplant and weaning have declined slightly, but remain encouragingly high. Bleeding and neurologic event rates have not increased.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaquiss et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Pediatric heart failure requiring ventricular assist device (n=295). Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device (postapproval usage) vs. IDE trial cohort was evaluated on Successful support (transplanted or successful weaning) (p=0.05). Postapproval usage of the Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric VAD in a real-world cohort resulted in a 77% rate of successful support compared to 90% in the IDE trial cohort (p=0.05).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: