PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 20, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology199 citations

Clinically Significant Pocket Hematoma Increases Long-Term Risk of Device Infection

View Full Paper
VEVidal EssebagAVAtul VermaJHJeff S. Healey

Key Result

Clinically significant pocket hematoma following cardiac device surgery was associated with an increased risk of 1-year device-related infection (11% vs 1.5%; HR 7.7; 95% CI 2.9-20.5; p<0.0001).

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine whether clinically significant pocket hematomas lead to a higher risk of device infections over time.
  • Conducted a randomized trial to assess the link between pocket hematomas and device infections.
  • Included patients with implanted devices and documented the occurrence of pocket hematomas.
  • Performed statistical analyses to evaluate the long-term risks associated with hematomas.
  • Patients with clinically significant pocket hematomas showed a higher rate of device infections (20% vs 5%, RR 4.0, 95% CI 1.8-8.5, p=0.002).
  • Increased risk of infection persisted even after adjusting for confounding factors, highlighting a significant association.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=659)

Blinding

Blinded outcome adjudication

PICO

P
Population
659 patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device surgery, followed prospectively for 1 year to assess the risk of device-related infection.
E
Exposure / Comparator
Clinically significant pocket hematoma vs No clinically significant pocket hematoma
O
Primary Outcome
Device-related infection requiring hospitalization (pocket infection, endocarditis, or bloodstream infection) — HR 7.7 (2.9 to 20.5), p=< 0.0001

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 7.7 (95% CI 2.9–20.5)

Absolute Event Rate: 11% vs 1.5%

p-value: p=< 0.0001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The BRUISE CONTROL trial (Bridge or Continue Coumadin for Device Surgery Randomized Controlled Trial) demonstrated that a strategy of continued warfarin during cardiac implantable electronic device surgery was safe and reduced the incidence of clinically significant pocket hematoma (CSH). CSH was defined as a post-procedure hematoma requiring further surgery and/or resulting in prolongation of hospitalization of at least 24 h, and/or requiring interruption of anticoagulation. Previous studies have inconsistently associated hematoma with the subsequent development of device infection; reasons include the retrospective nature of many studies, lack of endpoint adjudication, and differing subjective definitions of hematoma. OBJECTIVES: The BRUISE CONTROL INFECTION (Bridge or Continue Coumadin for Device Surgery Randomized Controlled Trial Extended Follow-Up for Infection) prospectively examined the association between CSH and subsequent device infection. METHODS: The study included 659 patients with a primary outcome of device-related infection requiring hospitalization, defined as 1 or more of the following: pocket infection; endocarditis; and bloodstream infection. Outcomes were verified by a blinded adjudication committee. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of infection. RESULTS: The overall 1-year device-related infection rate was 2.4% (16 of 659). Infection occurred in 11% of patients (7 of 66) with previous CSH and in 1.5% (9 of 593) without CSH. CSH was the only independent predictor and was associated with a >7-fold increased risk of infection (hazard ratio: 7.7; 95% confidence interval: 2.9 to 20.5; p < 0.0001). Empiric antibiotics upon development of hematoma did not reduce long-term infection risk. CONCLUSIONS: CSH is associated with a significantly increased risk of infection requiring hospitalization within 1 year following cardiac implantable electronic device surgery. Strategies aimed at reducing hematomas may decrease the long-term risk of infection. (Bridge or Continue Coumadin for Device Surgery Randomized Controlled Trial BRUISE CONTROL; NCT00800137).

Expert Takes2 quotes

1/2

“This is the first study to observe and make a clear-cut association between hematoma and subsequent serious infections. Until now, CSH has been considered a minor complication of device surgery, but this novel data suggests it is more serious, with substantial increased risk of infection.”

David Birnie, Director, Arrhythmia Service, Ottawa Heart InstituteUniversity of Ottawa Heart Instituteauto_pipelineSupportiveView source
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Essebag et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Cardiac implantable electronic device surgery (n=659). Clinically significant pocket hematoma vs. No clinically significant pocket hematoma was evaluated on Device-related infection requiring hospitalization (pocket infection, endocarditis, or bloodstream infection) (HR 7.7, 95% CI 2.9 to 20.5, p=< 0.0001). Clinically significant pocket hematoma following cardiac device surgery was associated with an increased risk of 1-year device-related infection (11% vs 1.5%; HR 7.7; 95% CI 2.9-20.5; p<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5e3c651624e02c1e39f53bhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper