The effect of pressure on the ionic conductivity of RbAg₄{I}₅$ and AgI has been measured, using single crystals and polycrystalline samples, up to pressures of 6 kbar. The activation volumes for motion in ${α}{-}Rb{Ag}₄{I}₅$ and ${β}{-}Rb{Ag}₄{I}₅, respectively, are -0.4 ± 0.2 and -0.2 ± 0.1{cm}³$/mole. In ${α}{-}AgI, the motion volume increases from 0.56 ± 0.1{cm}³/mole at 435 K to 0.8 ± 0.1{cm}³$/mole at 623 K. These values are unusually small in relation to the activation energies and are not consistent with the strain-energy model or a domain-diffusion mechanism. The logarithms of the ionic conductivities of α- and β-RbAg₄I₅ increase linearly at first and then decrease quadratically with pressure. This is related to the large quadratic pressure dependence of the second-order transition temperature ΔTc(K)=0.141P(kbar)+0.111P²(kbar²). The variation of the 122-K transition temperature with pressure is ΔTc(K)=5.65P(kbar)-0.53P²(kbar²), implying a molar volume change of V_β-V_γ=0.37±0.01 cm³/mole and a change in compressibility K_β-K_γ=(0.033±0.001)×10^-11 cm²/dyn across the transition. The ionic conductivity of γ-RbAg₄I₅ initially decreases with an activation volume of 9 ±{} 1 cm³/mole, and then levels off with increasing pressure. The negative activation volume for conduction along the c axis in β-AgI has been confirmed. Both low-temperature phases have large formation volumes consistent with the theory of Rice et al. of transitions to the superionic phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allen et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: